Posted On: February 15, 2009

Is US Government After Small IT Consulting Firms Who Sponsor H-1B Visas?

If you are somehow connected to the H1b visa program, whether you own or are employed by an IT consulting company, or whether you are a practitioner in the field, you cannot but help notice the increased investigative and prosecutorial efforts brought against such companies. There were 11 arrests recently in New Jersey involving a company called Vision Systems Group, Inc. for visa violations. The allegations include erroneous methodologies in the computation of prevailing wages for H1b workers. Another worthy article involving fraud allegation against small IT companies is what occurred on February 12, 2009 whereby the FBI and Immigration Officers arrested the 2 owners of a company called Worldwide Software, Inc. located in Iowa. The allegations against the aforementioned company owners include “misuse of immigration documents.” Even though the American Judicial System assumes one to be innocent until proven otherwise, such recent indictments and media coverage most definitely condemns these companies’ future viability. Lou Dobbs has also gone beyond to condemn the entire H1b visa program that it hurts US graduates from getting a job.

I have recently written a blog post relative to the enormous recent USCIS increase of Requests for Evidence (RFE) issuance against smaller IT companies who sponsor H1B visas. These RFEs have a debilitating effect on such smaller IT firms’ ability to hire additional H1b visa workers. A second blog post issued by our firm involve a sudden increased in USDOL H1B audits and LCA compliance investigations levied against small IT firms as well. Hence, if you summarize the recent governmental actions against small consulting companies, you come up with the following list:

1. What used to be a paperwork infraction in the H1B program is now being considered a criminal violation.

2. Smaller IT companies are being singled out and challenged by the USCIS in the form of cumulative paperwork inquiries aimed at frustrating their ability to hiring H1b visa workers even though such companies may have documentary proof that they are actively seeking US workers as well. These frustrating efforts come in USCIS issuing extensive requests for additional information seeking irrelevant information such as whether or not the IT Company occupies a building having proper zoning designation, etc.

3. Smaller IT companies have also been the target of increased Department of Labor audits resulting from complaints filed by “credible sources” relative to H1b practices.

These trends have few things in common: 1) most of these companies are information technology consulting firms owned by foreign individuals; 2) in my opinion, most of these alleged violations had occurred since the dawn of the H1B visa program; and 3) the recent increased enforcement activities will have the effect of increasing the legal cost of smaller companies to the point of either their extinction or abandonment of H1b visa sponsorship altogether. So you might ask, what is Uncle Sam really up to? Does Uncle Sam have something against foreign owned IT consulting companies? The logical answer is No. Then what is really going on?

Continue reading " Is US Government After Small IT Consulting Firms Who Sponsor H-1B Visas? " »

Posted On: February 10, 2009

Tougher H1B Restrictions on Companies Receiving TARP Funds Means Improved Business Prospect for Small Consulting Companies

The US Senate has passed an amendment to the legislation allowing the federal government to provide Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) funds to financial institutions which may restrict or eliminate their ability to sponsor foreign workers under the H1b visa program. The aforementioned amendment would automatically cause a financial institution which may receive TARP funds to become an "H1b Dependent Employer" whether or not they possessed 15% H1b visa employees on their payroll. Such a notion will force these financial institutions to make certain promises if they wished to hire an employee on H1B visa. These promises include, inter alia, that it had not displaced a US worker 90 days before and after the filling of a Labor Condition Application (LCA) within the same occupational classification filled by the H1b alien. This amendment may very well cause these financial institutions from abandoning hiring H1b visas as many of them have experienced layoffs. I predict that such legislation while appearing to have a "protective" facade of the welfare of the US worker, it in fact will not limit the hiring of H1b workers generally and will as a matter of fact cost these financial institutions more in locating competent staff during some of the most challenging economic times.

Unfortunately, this is a political statement by the US Senate which has little to do with restoring confidence in the market place or to solve the growing unemployment rate currently experienced by the US labor force. This amendment is nothing but a political statement by the US Senate to appease special interest groups who are opposed to the H1b visa program. The general populous has a mistaken belief that H1b visa workers are the cause of the high unemployment rate experienced by the US. The truth of the matter is that H1b visa workers do not receive less wages; to the contrary they cost the employer a great deal of resources, both monetarily and otherwise to secure their employment. First employers wishing to employ foreign workers on H-1b visas must first pay prevailing wages; such employers must also pay legal fees as well as exorbitant governmental processing fees ( which could be as $2,320 for each H1b worker) to process their cases; in addition, employers hiring H1b workers also incur into other soft costs associated with record keeping requirements. Since it actually costs more to hire workers under the H1b program, it follows that employers will actually only do so when they are unable to find competent US workers to fill these positions.

Continue reading " Tougher H1B Restrictions on Companies Receiving TARP Funds Means Improved Business Prospect for Small Consulting Companies " »